Posts Tagged ‘5G and health’

The Geneva Switzerland Cantonal Parliament has submitted a motion on Wednesday evening for a moratorium on 5G antennas in the cantonal area. The motion requires independent scientific evidence of any damage to health prior to the moratorium being lifted.

In Geneva’s Grand Council it was said that many mobile operators would explain to consumers that 5G was the same as 4G. However, the environment is increasingly burdened by electromagnetic waves and nobody knows about the health effects. The canton parliament also wants to know about the effects on animals.

With 58 to 28 votes, the council referred the motion to the government, which is now to turn to the World Health Organization for independent research.

More from Dr Martin Pall on 5G – see
https://www.emfacts.com/2018/08/martin-palls-book-on-5g-is-available-online/

Listen to the interview: https://archives.kpfa.org/data/20180814-Tue1300.mp3

We know that there is a massive literature, providing a high level of scientific certainty, for each of eight pathophysiological effects caused by non-thermal microwave frequency EMF exposures.
This is shown in from 12 to 35 reviews on each specific effect, with each review listed in Chapter 1, providing a substantial body of evidence on the existence of each effect.

Such EMFs:
1. Attack our nervous systems including our brains leading to widespread neurological/neuropsychiatric effects and possibly many other effects. This nervous system attack is of great concern.

2. Attack our endocrine (that is hormonal) systems. In this context, the main things that make us functionally different from single celled creatures are our nervous system and our endocrine systems – even a simple planaria worm needs both of these. Thus the consequences of the disruption of these two regulatory systems is immense, such that it is a travesty to ignore these findings.

3. Produce oxidative stress and free radical damage, which have central roles in essentially all chronic diseases.

4. Attack the DNA of our cells, producing single strand and double strand breaks in cellular DNA and oxidized bases in our cellular DNA. These in turn produce cancer and also mutations in germ line cells which produce mutations in future generations.

5. Produce elevated levels of apoptosis (programmed cell death), events especially important in causing both neurodegenerative diseases and infertility.

6. Lower male and female fertility, lower sex hormones, lower libido and increased levels of spontaneous abortion and, as already stated, attack the DNA in sperm cells.

7. Produce excessive intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i and excessive calcium signaling.

8. Attack the cells of our bodies to cause cancer. Such attacks are thought to act via 15 different mechanisms during cancer causation

Tom Wheeler, FCC Chair and former director of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association (CTIA), has had decades-long contempt for health/enviro effects from EMF/RF — it is barely concealed here in a short clip from his recent announcement re: 5G. There’s a short notation that someone previously asked him about cancer and wireless and he brushed it off saying “Talk with the medical people.” Well the “medical people” have been talking ’til they are blue in the face re: this and he bats them aside too. Over 200 MDs and Ph.D’s signed a petition last year alone, plus the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Environmental  Medicine and other august medical groups have too.What exactly does it take? After this segment another link comes up from his briefing at the National Press Club where his technophoria is downright creepy. He’s supposed to be a regulator, not a cheerleader. The Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council filed an 11-page comment (attached) prior to FCC’s vote because it’s important to get on record, but honestly, it’s running headfirst into a brick wall. 5G is dangerous. Other countries throughout Europe and New Zealand have elected to study 5G’s effects before deployment — but not in the USA.
This clip shows how Tom brushes off the question about cancer and 5G… so much for freedom of information or investigating all sides of the story. Basically they are in bed with the telecom industry.For those who want to know, Hillary is very pro 5G (it was her husband who introduced all this back in the 1990’s); not sure about Trump.

Thanks to Michele Hertz. And to Kevin Mottus for asking the question. very short clip